[Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm-07

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Reviewer: Radek Krejčí
Review result: Ready with Nits

The draft addresses/fixes previous comments.

The draft, as well as the module, is well written and the only issue I've found
is kind of unclear use for the
/nw:networks/nw:network/nt:link/pm-attributes/vpn-pm-type choice. I don't
understand the logic of having one case config true and the second one config
false. Does it mean that the second one is the default? Then it should be
stated in the choice. I'm not an expert in the area, but I understand the
choice as a way for clients to select the type of performance monitoring. Then
it is kind of confusing that I can actually select only one of the available
types. What about having config true presence container in the second case and
holding config false leaf(s) there, wouldn't it be more clear?


-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux