It appears that Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@xxxxxxxxx> said: >-=-=-=-=-=- > >I do not think this last call is well-formed. There is no link to the >document and it is not available via the datatracker. It's difficult to >see how the community can successfully give advice on a matter with no >document (and not even an abstract). > >May I ask that the IESG consider re-issuing this last call with the >appropriate pointers? At the very least, it should say TPC.INT, not TCP.INT. What they're proposing is reasonable but it needs a better paper (electronic?) trail. R's, John -- Regards, John Levine, johnl@xxxxxxxxx, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
