I do not think this last call is well-formed. There is no link to the document and it is not available via the datatracker. It's difficult to see how the community can successfully give advice on a matter with no document (and not even an abstract).
May I ask that the IESG consider re-issuing this last call with the appropriate pointers?
thanks,
Ted Hardie
On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 4:08 PM The IESG <iesg-secretary@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
The IESG has received a request from the Internet Engineering Steering Group
IETF (iesg) to consider the following document: - 'Moving TCP.INT and
NSAP.INT infrastructure domains to historic'
<status-change-int-tlds-to-historic-00.txt>
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
last-call@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2022-04-26. Exceptionally, comments may
be sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the beginning
of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
Abstract
The file can be obtained via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-int-tlds-to-historic/
No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
_______________________________________________
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
