Re: [admin-discuss] [rfc-i] Public archival of AUTH48 communications

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



As others have said, thanks for working to increase the transparency of IETF processes.

 

I have seen both sides of the issues brought up by Lucas, Eric, and Ted.  As a WG chair, I tried to be diligent in bringing things back to the WG when it seemed necessary, but it’s not great that this depends on the whims and views of one person. On the other hand, very few people really want to follow, let alone participate in, detailed arguments about the Chicago Manual of Style.

 

I don’t have a proposal, just confirming the point raised by others.

 


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux