You can read version 12.
From: ietf <ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx> on behalf of Scheffenegger, Richard <rs.ietf@xxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, February 1, 2022 2:41:19 PM
To: Ladislav Lhotka <ladislav.lhotka@xxxxxx>; ietf@xxxxxxxx <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Fwd: IPv10 is the solution.
Sent: Tuesday, February 1, 2022 2:41:19 PM
To: Ladislav Lhotka <ladislav.lhotka@xxxxxx>; ietf@xxxxxxxx <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Fwd: IPv10 is the solution.
nothing to see here - after this discussion sparked my interest (I'm not
saying if in a positive or less so way).
To quote the only actual text from the draft
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-omar-ipv10-13
"This contribution has been withdrawn."
Can we please move on?
R
Am 01.02.2022 um 13:27 schrieb Ladislav Lhotka:
> On 01. 02. 22 13:02, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 11:54:57AM +0000,
>> Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
>> a message of 265 lines which said:
>>
>>> https://www.exeley.com/international_journal_advanced_network_monitoring_controls/doi/10.21307/ijanmc-2019-075
>>>
>>
>> Just for the people who don't know: there are many journals with the
>> look and feel of scientific journals, and overblown titles such as
>> "International journal of advanced things" that publish anything,
>> literally anything, just to have content (and sometimes the author has
>> to pay for it).
>>
>> It is not specific to computer networks, there are a lot of them in
>> biology, for instance, allowing unscrupulous or desperate people to
>> inflate their list of publications
>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Publish_or_perish>
>>
>> Don't fall in the trap: anyone can publish anything on the Internet
>> and these journals are contentless.
>>
>
> Maybe we have to ask whether it is still a good thing that anybody can
> publish anything as an Internet-Draft. Yes, IPv10 is quite a singular
> case, but this is already n-th iteration ...
>
> Lada
>
saying if in a positive or less so way).
To quote the only actual text from the draft
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-omar-ipv10-13
"This contribution has been withdrawn."
Can we please move on?
R
Am 01.02.2022 um 13:27 schrieb Ladislav Lhotka:
> On 01. 02. 22 13:02, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 11:54:57AM +0000,
>> Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
>> a message of 265 lines which said:
>>
>>> https://www.exeley.com/international_journal_advanced_network_monitoring_controls/doi/10.21307/ijanmc-2019-075
>>>
>>
>> Just for the people who don't know: there are many journals with the
>> look and feel of scientific journals, and overblown titles such as
>> "International journal of advanced things" that publish anything,
>> literally anything, just to have content (and sometimes the author has
>> to pay for it).
>>
>> It is not specific to computer networks, there are a lot of them in
>> biology, for instance, allowing unscrupulous or desperate people to
>> inflate their list of publications
>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Publish_or_perish>
>>
>> Don't fall in the trap: anyone can publish anything on the Internet
>> and these journals are contentless.
>>
>
> Maybe we have to ask whether it is still a good thing that anybody can
> publish anything as an Internet-Draft. Yes, IPv10 is quite a singular
> case, but this is already n-th iteration ...
>
> Lada
>
