>> I can't see any point to deploy something else with
address length as long as that of IPv6.
address length as long as that of IPv6.
Please read the IPv10 draft again.
Best regards,
Khaled Omar
From: ietf <ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx> on behalf of Masataka Ohta <mohta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, February 1, 2022 2:23:34 PM
To: ietf@xxxxxxxx <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: IPv10 is the solution.
Sent: Tuesday, February 1, 2022 2:23:34 PM
To: ietf@xxxxxxxx <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: IPv10 is the solution.
Khaled Omar wrote:
> I read a lot of articles on the internet about IPv10,
I'm afraid it is a reinvention of "IPv4-compatible IPv6 address".
As IPv6 is hopeless partly because of its unnecessarily lengthy
addresses, I can't see any point to deploy something else with
address length as long as that of IPv6.
Masataka Ohta
> I read a lot of articles on the internet about IPv10,
I'm afraid it is a reinvention of "IPv4-compatible IPv6 address".
As IPv6 is hopeless partly because of its unnecessarily lengthy
addresses, I can't see any point to deploy something else with
address length as long as that of IPv6.
Masataka Ohta
