On Sat, Apr 24, 2004 at 01:34:06PM +0200, jfcm wrote: > Dear Markus, > to know where your remarks may lead, let come back to 1993. You mean like in http://ksi.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/archives/WWW-TALK/www-talk-1993q4.messages/579.html > At 21:16 23/04/04, Markus Stumpf wrote: > >Hmmm ... > > For instance, Internet addresses ending in ".mobi" would allow sites > > built for the small screens of mobile phones. This was a cite from the article, not my opinion! If it wasn't clear from my posting: I am *against* those new TLDs. > >IMHO all these have their origin in that the "semantic web" is at best > >a slow starter and they try to put sematics into the web by adding > >"semantic TLDs". > > "Semantic web" is only DNC (Domain Name Confusion) unless it uses a correct > grammar (oherwise there will be nothing to sell even for the worst > merchant). Grammar says the protocol is in the scheme, the intefaces in > upper level names, domain name in the SLD and the interneted network in the > TLD. You are talking about IMHO the syntax of URLs, I am talking about http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/ and http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?articleID=00048144-10D2-1C70-84A9809EC588EF21&catID=2 where people would probably stop abusing DNS domains as registers for marketing, to reflect content in the domain name. \Maex -- SpaceNet AG | Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 | Fon: +49 (89) 32356-0 Research & Development | D-80807 Muenchen | Fax: +49 (89) 32356-299 "The security, stability and reliability of a computer system is reciprocally proportional to the amount of vacuity between the ears of the admin" _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf