Re: "professional" in an IETF context

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/1/21 10:08 AM, Miles Fidelman wrote:

And the goal should be to prevent IETF perform meaningless
engineering such as development of stupid protocols, including
but not limited to, IPv6 and LISP.
Now THIS seems like a living example of something that is both unprofessional AND uncivil.

I don't agree with that opinion of IPv6.    (I'll reserve opinion about LISP - I didn't like what it was when originally proposed, but I haven't tried to evaluate what it ended up being.)  

But people absolutely should be free to criticize IETF work, even work that some people are pleased with.   Even if they say that the work is useless, meaningless, or harmful.

(it might help, though, if the criticism has some informative detail to it, so that readers can understand why it's being criticized.)

Keith



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux