Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Actually, I think it’s best not to try to do that, just as the IESG has written up lists of desired expertise and doesn’t try to micro-manage that.  We can give NomComs guidance along different axes and then let them use their judgment in how to apply them to the situation they are given.  Their good judgment is what we’re asking them to volunteer as NomCom members.

Barry

On Sat, Oct 23, 2021 at 4:21 AM Lars Eggert <lars@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,

I’m wondering what the opinions are on how a NomCom should weigh the importance of a gap year (or similar concept) against other considerations they have been told to pay attention to, such as no more that two members in a body with the same affiliation, other diversity guidance, etc.?

If we think that additional guidance to the NomComs would be useful, we should probably also give them some idea of how to weigh it against other guidance we already gave them?

Thanks,
Lars

--
Sent from a mobile device; please excuse typos.

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux