On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 23:47 Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Scott,On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 12:38 PM Scott Bradner <sob@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:RFC 1818 is not a good reference for BCPs - RFC 2026 is the better oneThat reference is preserved from RFC 3967. Also, RFC 1818 is not obsolete, so presumably what it says is still valid.Should that spot refer to both 2026 and 1818, perhaps?
Actually, RFC 1818 is marked Historic and RFC 2026 Section 5 has a much more complete discussion of the purpose of a BCP and the processes associated with them, at least in my opinion.
Thanks
===============================================
David Farmer Email:farmer@xxxxxxx
Networking & Telecommunication Services
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota
2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952
===============================================
David Farmer Email:farmer@xxxxxxx
Networking & Telecommunication Services
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota
2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952
===============================================
