Linda, thank you for your review. I have entered a Discuss ballot for this document (the IESG needs to approve a DOWNREF). Lars > On 2021-9-14, at 7:46, Linda Dunbar via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Reviewer: Linda Dunbar > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-extra-quota-06 > Reviewer: Linda Dunbar > Review Date: 2021-09-13 > IETF LC End Date: 2021-09-10 > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > Summary: The document describes an extension (QUOTA extension) to allow > administrative limits on resource usage to be manipulated by IMAP protocol. > > Major issues: None > > Minor issues: None > > Nits/editorial comments: > > Section 5.1 first paragraph: > " they MUST NOT refuse to APPEND a message if the limit less the usage is > smaller than the RFC822.SIZE divided by 1024" > > does it mean "must break the message" if the limit minus the usage is smaller > than RFC822.size/1024? > > "APPEND a message": what message is to be appended? > > Why "divide by 1024"? > > Thank you > Linda Dunbar > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
