Salz, Rich <rsalz=40akamai.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Nominations close in ten days. The IAB has eight people vying for six
> positions. All other technical positions – i.e., the IESG – are
> running unopposed.
> Given the recent survey, I view this as disastrous. Have any outgoing
> members tried to find replacements?
Given pandemic situation, it may not be as terrible a result as you suggest.
Specifically, I'm suggesting that various degrees of arm twisting and
persuasion would often occur over the summer, in person. (over beer...)
BUT, I mostly agree with you. It's a bit of a process disaster.
One question I know that nomcom have asked is:
How will you find/plan for a successor?
As I've said repeatedly, if you want to know who are eligible to become ADs, the list
is here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/photos/
If ADs aren't inserting the right new blood here, then there won't be any new
blood on the IESG candidate list.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
