Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 30-Sep-21 04:07, Michael Richardson wrote:
>>
>> Barry Leiba <barryleiba@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > I think that 2, 5, 7, 8, 9, and 10 should be in a weekly summary, one
>> > single message per week.
>>
>> Mailman has a digest mode. Would that suffice?
> No, because from observation, most people who reply to a digest don't
> change the Subject to a useful string. This would be disastrous for
> Last Call workflows in particular.
The categories proposed that would be on a list that would be digestable
would be (based upon what Barry wrote):
>>>> 2. Announcements of new and updated WG charters & WG closures = 44
>>>> 5. Announcements of new RFCs = 275
>>>> 7. Announcements of document actions = 175
>>>> 8. Announcements of IESG conflict-review results = 14
>>>> 9. Last call announcements for I-Ds = 174 (+ 4 for other actions)
>>>> 10. Interim WG meeting announcements = 256
So, we'd need to not include Last Call Announcements in that list.
Then would it work for you?
A thing that I like about the digest option is that the archives (and IMAP)
would have the individual messages.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
