On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 12:57:21PM +0000, Salz, Rich wrote: > > one may as well delegate the TLSA record management to the CDN: > > Sure, if you're never going to switch CDN's. No, to *each* CDN. Each one can publish the appropriate TLSA RRs for its service. > There is a whole industry and providers around switching CDN's in real > time. Web-search "Cdn switch" will find them, for example. What do you mean by "in real-time"? > > But any sort of TLSA RR on the customer side, while the cert rollover > are managed by the CDN is too fragile. The TLSA RRs should properly > be published by the CDN as above. > > Sure, if there's one CDN. It also works for multiple CDNs, provided they don't keep switching back and forth, or proving some modest set of trust-anchors is known to cover them all. > > If indeed sub-minute migration from one CDN to another is required, then > the TTL for the _443._tcp.[...] CNAME would need to be sub-minute. Is > such a short cutover time really a requirement? > > If millions of dollars of commerce are happening per minute, then yes. > Or the head of state dies and the official news source is overloaded. And do they keep switching back and forth, or is a one time switch stable for some days or longer? -- Viktor.