We have already addressed the GenArt comments, thank you Suresh!
I will respond to Lars's review separately.
Yaron
On 4/6/21, 15:52, "Lars Eggert" <lars@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Suresh, thank you for your review. I have entered a Discuss ballot for this document based on my own review.
Lars
> On 2021-3-25, at 21:10, Suresh Krishnan via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan
> Review result: Ready with Nits
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
>
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
>
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>
> Document: draft-ietf-acme-star-delegation-??
> Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan
> Review Date: 2021-03-23
> IETF LC End Date: 2021-03-22
> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
>
> Summary:
>
> Major issues:
>
> Minor issues:
>
> Nits/editorial comments:
>
> There are a few lines longer than 72 characters and this will fail the ID Nits
> check. I dug a bit deeper and found out some of these lines were in the CDDL in
> Appendix B. Here are the lines if that helps.
>
> % awk 'length($0)>72 { print length($0) $0}'
> draft-ietf-acme-star-delegation-06.txt 73Intended status: Standards Track
> D. López 76; RSASSA-PSS with SHA-256, MGF-1 with
> SHA-256, and a salt length of 32 bytes 76; RSASSA-PSS with SHA-384, MGF-1 with
> SHA-384, and a salt length of 48 bytes 76; RSASSA-PSS with SHA-512, MGF-1 with
> SHA-512, and a salt length of 64 bytes
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@xxxxxxxx
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
