Suresh, thank you for your review. I have entered a Discuss ballot for this document based on my own review. Lars > On 2021-3-25, at 21:10, Suresh Krishnan via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-acme-star-delegation-?? > Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan > Review Date: 2021-03-23 > IETF LC End Date: 2021-03-22 > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > Summary: > > Major issues: > > Minor issues: > > Nits/editorial comments: > > There are a few lines longer than 72 characters and this will fail the ID Nits > check. I dug a bit deeper and found out some of these lines were in the CDDL in > Appendix B. Here are the lines if that helps. > > % awk 'length($0)>72 { print length($0) $0}' > draft-ietf-acme-star-delegation-06.txt 73Intended status: Standards Track > D. López 76; RSASSA-PSS with SHA-256, MGF-1 with > SHA-256, and a salt length of 32 bytes 76; RSASSA-PSS with SHA-384, MGF-1 with > SHA-384, and a salt length of 48 bytes 76; RSASSA-PSS with SHA-512, MGF-1 with > SHA-512, and a salt length of 64 bytes > > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
