Hi Ben,
At 08:20 PM 01-04-2021, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
[obligatory disclosure: this is not a statement of the IESG, and I did not
consult with any of my fellow ADs on its content before sending. It is
shaped in part by some discussions we had, but the opinions expressed are
my own.]
Ok.
draft-wood-term-modest-proposal-00 is, in my opinion, a social
commentary formulated as a criticism of the IETF. The first three
words in the title of the draft is an indication that it is likely
satire. The sentence in Section 10 is further indication that the
document was intended as an "April 1" document. As a side comment,
there was a discussion about such documents eight years ago.
The author attempted to draw attention to a problem. Is the problem
about acceptable terminology or something else?
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
