Re: rfc791 coming up to 40 years ... what to do (remember, celebrate, ...?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> On Mar 25, 2021, at 11:53 AM, Nico Williams <nico@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 04:57:28PM -0700, Joseph Touch wrote:
>> IMO, what IPsec got wrong was tunnel mode; it should have just been
>> transport mode and IP-IP tunneling (RFC 3884 explains why).
> 
> But IPsec also got transport mode wrong because what it really got wrong
> was authentication and authorization.
...
> A better approach would have been to have had connection latching (RFC
> 5660) and IPsec-specific socket options so that IPsec would do no
> authorization in transport mode.  
...
> But I'm the author of RFC 5660, so call me biased.  The above opinion
> has been a minority view since the inception of the now-concluded BTNS
> WG.

And given I created BTNS, you’ll get no argument from me ;-)

But that seems like more of an argument against IKE than IPsec.

Joe




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux