There has been a very long thread on last-call about the crocker draft on
email emojis. I'm now seeing the secdir review of
draft-ietf-ecrit-location-profile-registry-policy-01 and subsequent thread
related to that. (Not yet as long as emoji)
Now, I think that the crocker draft was AD sponsored so maybe it didn't have
another place for the thread to go. But, certain draft-ietf-ecrit should
go back to ecrit list only?
I'm just wondering if last-call is working the way it was imagined it would,
or if there are some anomalies here. Should some kind of Reply-To: be enforced?
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
