On 03/03/2021 12:23, Dave Crocker wrote:
On 3/2/2021 4:17 PM, Randall Gellens wrote:
I'm just curious why the choice for a reaction to be a body part
rather than an attribute on the In-Reply-To header field?
Randy,
This was a matter of significant discussion on the ietf-822 list, and
the current draft is fundamentally different from my original
submission, as a result of that discussion. My original spec was
problematic in a number of ways, some of which had been an itch in my
brain that I hadn't adequately perceived.
The decisive "I could have had a V8" moment came with Ned's posting on
21 Oct (6:43am, by my MUA) titled: "Review of and suggested changes for
draft-crocker-inreply-react-01.txt".
The actual mail can be found at
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-822/pILLpCxkxqGaypthzTdOh_eEsgU
(Archived-At: is your friend).
Regards, Martin.
Really, it my reaction(...) was that this was m u c h better than
what I'd designed.
--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
