Re: [Last-Call] [Tsv-art] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-05

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi, Gorry,

On 19/2/21 06:30, Gorry Fairhurst wrote:
TSV-ART reviews are for our transport ADs's, so they will look at this in IETF-LC.

Always keen for improvements, anyway!


[....]
* The ID also discusses use of the IPv6 Flow Label: This seems a little off
topic, but seems linked to EH implications on ECMP.  However, the final
sentence of this section is a reference to [Jaeggli-2018] which in turn
concludes that the IPv6 Flow Label should not be used it as a part of hashes for load balancing. Yet, as far as I know, this is not the recommendation of the IETF in 2020.

FWIW, we discuss the Flow Label a bit because the usual reaction would be "why do you process the header chain for load-balancing, instead of employing the Flow Label?"


Thanks - I see. Brian's Carpenter's suggestion would also help avoid misinterpretation.

Cool. We'll apply both.



[...]
* A definition would be helpful for /RLDRAM/.

Would a reference to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RLDRAM ; do the trick?  Or were you just suggesting to expand the acronym?


I'd suggest to avoid the URL to wikipedia (people can easily find that - or a more concrete reference, but need to be certain of the term). To be clear, I was more expecting a simple expansion:

"Reduced Latency DRAM (RLDRAM)"

Fair enough. I'll expand the acronym.  (I agree with you about Wikipedia)



* There are many types and sizes of routers, is this true of all routers
(including low-end) or could this better reflect some type of routers? So, maybe the following statements could use better words than /most contemporary routers/? /Most contemporary routers use dedicated hardware/ … and later: /Most
contemporary routers have a fast hardware-assisted forwarding plane/

You mean something like "carrier-grade router"?

That would be much better, or something similar that differentiates this from AP's, desktop routers, etc.

Fair enough. I'll incorporate "carrier-grade router" unless anybody can come up with a better term.

Thanks!

Regards,
--
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fgont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492




--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux