Hi Scott, > Dan, thanks for the review. Would you please give me a little more on > what you think is needed to explain the relationship between the two > documents? I can't think of much more to say beyond "7482 describes > protocol queries" and "7483 describes protocol responses to the queries > described in 7482", but would adding a few sentences to that effect in > the Introduction do what you're suggesting? Of course, the RFC numbers > will need to be updated. I think the idea was (at least partially) that this, as rfc7482bis, should describe its relationship with rfc7482-not-bis (e.g., that it obsoletes the latter for purpose of advancing the protocol to Internet Standard), in both Abstract and Introduction. The fact that this document is not listed as having an Obsoletes: relationship to rfc7482 (outside of the shepherd writeup) makes the question of what exactly the relationship between the two is much more interesting... -Ben -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
