Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: Advancing the Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) to Internet Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: last-call <last-call-bounces@xxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of S Moonesamy
> Sent: Monday, February 15, 2021 2:09 AM
> To: last-call@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: Advancing the Registration Data
> Access Protocol (RDAP) to Internet Standard
> 
> Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links
> or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content
> is safe.
> 
> Hello,
> At 11:46 AM 10-02-2021, The IESG wrote:
> >The IESG has received a request from the REGEXT working group to make
> >the following status changes:
> >
> >- RFC7480 from Proposed Standard to Internet Standard
> >     (HTTP Usage in the Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP))
> >
> >- RFC7481 from Proposed Standard to Internet Standard
> >     (Security Services for the Registration Data Access Protocol
> >(RDAP))

[snip]

> There are currently two protocols for accessing registration data, i.e. Whois
> and RDAP.  Whois is still widely used.  There isn't any information in the about
> the current status of Whois and its relationship with the intended Internet
> Standard.  Is the "widespread deployment" about deploying the two
> protocols deployed side by side?

WHOIS and RDAP are independent. The RDAP specifications already note that they were created to address the known issues with WHOIS. The "widespread deployment" comment refers to RDAP alone.

Scott

-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux