Hi Dave, Thanks for the review. See below. On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 4:44 PM David Schinazi via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Reviewer: David Schinazi > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-oam-req-frmwk-04 > Reviewer: David Schinazi > Review Date: 2021-02-05 > IETF LC End Date: 2021-02-16 > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > Summary: Thank you for a well-written document. > It introduces a lot of terminology I wasn't used to, > but does a good job of explaining it. > > Major issues: None > > Minor issues: None > > Nits/editorial comments: > - The abstract defines all the acronyms (which is great) except PBB, could it define that one too? > - Section 2.1 doesn't really explain what a "P node" is. Sure, we can expand PBB (Provider Backbone Bridge) in the abstract and say in Section 2.1 that P is Provider. These should probably also be added to the terminology section. I've made these changes in the working copy but they are pretty minor so I think I'll wait for the results of other reviews before uploading a new version. Thanks, Donald =============================== Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA d3e3e3@xxxxxxxxx -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
