Re: Non routable IPv6 registry proposal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On Jan 23, 2021, at 8:37 PM, Fernando Gont <fgont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On 23/1/21 14:12, Joe Touch wrote:
>>>> On Jan 22, 2021, at 11:37 PM, Fernando Gont <fgont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> 
>>> One *internet-draft* certainly doesn't undermine E2E. However, I guess
>>> that an *RFC* published as a "Proposed Standard" probably does (undermine) E2E?
>> Not when it doesn’t update the hundreds of other standards that don’t.
> 
> It doesn't formally update them, true. But it is a de-facto update: behavior that goes against such other standards has been approved as PS.

There is no such thing as de facto updates.

You’re confusing the “let a thousand flowers bloom” approach with a change in architecture. 




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux