Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> While ULAs and privacy enhanced addresses have important uses for
>> individual privacy, when it comes to non-moving business/enterprise
>> infrastructure, audit and accountability is much more important, and
>> ULA-R does not satisfy that.
> How is that problem solved today for RFC 1918 addresses?
It's not.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
