RE: Trans WG inactive?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Julian!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf <ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Julian Reschke
> Sent: Friday, December 18, 2020 3:11 AM
> To: IETF Discussion <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Trans WG inactive?
> 
> Hi there,
> 
> I was wondering why one of our HTTPBIS documents doesn't get published:
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-expect-ct/> - it has been in
> the RFC Editor queue for almost two years now.
> 
> Turns out that it depends on
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis/>, which is in
> state "revised ID needed"; and has been in that state since spring.
> 
> The Trans WG's mailing list doesn't show any activity since June.
> 
> What's going on here?

The TRANS WG has one remaining document, draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis, to finish.  After much delay, a renewed push is underway to address the DISCUSS feedback from IESG Review.

Regards,
Roman

> Best regards, Julian





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux