On Wed, 3 Mar 2004, Nathaniel Borenstein wrote: > The problem with this kind of proposal is that it punishes too many of > the wrong people. I myself was the victim of a blacklist for most of > last year; my ISP was blacklisted by another ISP, and they spent 6 > months arguing about it, during which time all my email to users of the > other ISP was blocked (although they kept helpfully telling me that I > could always switch to using *them* as my ISP). For them to offer competing service while blocking your ISP is probably an unfair business practice. This is probably something that you should document and forward to your ISP's legal department. There are a number of torts for them to consider. Blocking email without permission is a violation of state and federal law as well. State law varies, though it is usually much broader. Federal law is codified in the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 USC 2501 et al, and 18 USC 2701 et al. Most AUP's and service contracts give the ISP the _limited_ permission to block spam. However, blocking things other than spam is not permitted, and thus not lawful. You should have contacted your lawyer. Indeed, you should still contact your lawyer, as federal law provides you with a civil action to recover a minimum $1000 per user blocked, plus your attorney's fees. Both the users affected and your ISP can initiate a civil action on these violations. --Dean