On Thu, Dec 17, 2020, at 20:42, Fernando Gont wrote: > FWIW, our argument is essentially that if constancy is not required in a > given context, then you should generally avoid it. i.e., > "unlinkability", where possible, should be the default. I'm not sure that this is sufficient if it means uncoordinated changes, or that that works in every context. This says nothing about cross-layer coordination or managing trade-offs at different layers. This is another reason to avoid making such strong recommendations. I sympathize with the sentiment, but as a general statement I can't support this recommendation. Capturing this as a goal and explaining the consequences of not achieving it should suffice. -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
