Maybe I am old school, I was looking at the TXT. The HTML provides us
with circles instead of ASCII squares, and that's certainly prettier.
And I think I understand now why I was confused. I was expecting a Venn
diagram showing the intersections of methods 1, 2, and 3. Instead,
Figures 1 and 2 are showing the intersection of method 1, (methods 2+3),
and the 2020 volunteers list. I assume the point is to demonstrate that
the new methods are a superset of the old one, but it appears to not be
a complete superset since 1 volunteer is excluded. That would be worth a
bit of explanation.
Figures 3 and 4 show the intersection of method 2 and 3 with "The
discarded path via IESG and IAB service", shown as path "I". It took me
some time to understand what that meant. I assume that at some point,
there was a proposal to automatically qualify prior members of the IESG
or IAB within some time horizon. I also assume that that was discussed
at length on the mailing list and so appear sobvious to a number of
readers of the draft. And I also assume that the diagrams are there to
argue that "see, we don't need this IESG/IAB criteria, all relevant
people are qualified via path 2 or 3 anyhow." Let's say that your text
is a little bit dry, as it took me some time to fill in the blanks.
-- Christian Huitema
On 12/11/2020 2:51 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Christian,
I did try that, before Carsten taught us how to do the Venn diagrams in ASCII. But the results didn't seem at all readable to me. Don't we want to encourage people to look at the HTML format these days?
Regards
Brian
On 12-Dec-20 09:02, Christian Huitema wrote:
Just a minor nit for an otherwise good looking draft: I have a hard time reading and understanding the Venn-diagrams-as-ascii-art in the "available data" appendix. Would it be possible to also provide the same data in tabular format?
-- Christian Huitema
On 12/2/2020 7:43 AM, The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider the
following document: - 'Additional Criteria for Nominating Committee
Eligibility'
<draft-carpenter-eligibility-expand-08.txt> as Experimental RFC
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
last-call@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2020-12-30. Exceptionally, comments may
be sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the beginning
of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
Abstract
This document defines a process experiment under RFC 3933 that
temporarily updates the criteria for qualifying volunteers to
participate in the IETF Nominating Committee. It therefore also
updates the criteria for qualifying signatories to a community recall
petition. The purpose is to make the criteria more flexible in view
of increasing remote participation in the IETF and a reduction in
face-to-face meetings. The experiment is of fixed duration and will
apply to one, or at most two, Nominating Committee cycles. This
document temporarily varies the rules in RFC 8713.
The file can be obtained via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-carpenter-eligibility-expand/
No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
_______________________________________________
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
