Re: [Last-Call] [Lsr] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-yang-isis-reverse-metric-01

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Agreed. There is a boiler plate for Security Considerations that all YANG models should start with. 
Thanks,
Acee

On 12/10/20, 12:18 PM, "Lsr on behalf of tom petch" <lsr-bounces@xxxxxxxx on behalf of ietfc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

    From: Lsr <lsr-bounces@xxxxxxxx> on behalf of Michael Richardson via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx>
    Sent: 07 December 2020 02:49

    Reviewer: Michael Richardson
    Review result: Ready

    This document is a short YANG module relating to RFC8500, and expertise in that
    RFC are required to be sure if all the right control bits are required. It has
    reasonable security consideration, although the words, "The lowest NETCONF
    layer is the secure transport layer" seems a bit awkward. I would instead
    write, "All [NETCONF] transactions run over a secure transport layer, which is
    SSH"...

    <tp>
    I think that that would be a mistake.  The text in question is specified by YANG Guidelines RFC8407  and appears in (almost) all I-D with a YANG Module.  The text is the consensus of the NETMOD WG.  The Secure Transport layer is a defined part of the Netconf architecture and can be implemented by at least four protocols.

    Tom Petch


    _______________________________________________
    Lsr mailing list
    Lsr@xxxxxxxx
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

    _______________________________________________
    Lsr mailing list
    Lsr@xxxxxxxx
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux