Hi. Inspired (if that is the right term) by the recent discussions about FTP, I went back and reread the spec (RFC 959) today and made two rediscoveries of problems/issues. Before I explain them (and try to keep this short), I will pose the key question: does anyone here have responsibility (or the inclination to fuss with) FTP client and/or server software and, if so, would you be inclined to make changes to fix bugs or near-bugs? Anyone offended by the very idea of updates or clarifications to FTP should please skip to the last paragraph. Issues: TYPE ASCII assumes that whatever text files exist on the sending system can be converted to NVT ASCII. Back in 1985 and earlier, that could require some effort and maybe some small compromises, but it wasn't conceptually difficult. Today, with a great deal of Unicode on the network, there are no possible conversions, at least unless "NVT ASCII" is redefined to include assorted escape sequences (clearly not the intent and, from a user standpoint, almost certainly bad news, but see below). So: (1) Do we need a specific error code for "you specified 'TYPE ASCII' but the file you want to transfer cannot be converted". In principle, the same code would apply to TYPE EBCDIC, but I haven't seen much of that the wild lately. If the answer is "no", what would we expect implementations to do under those circumstances? (2) In the interest of an increasingly internationalized Internet, is it time to look again at a Unicode type, perhaps using the long-expired draft-klensin-ftpext-typeu as a starting point? I haven't looked at it in seven or eight years, so don't have an opinion as to whether it would be useful. (3) I hope the answer to the question of Unicode in NVT ASCII is not "escape sequence" but, if it is, do we need a specification, however short, about which of the many possible escape sequences is to be used and/or identified? Request: I think the topic of whether anyone who thinks about using FTP, much less updating it, needs to be dragged kicking and screaming into the 21st century and/or suffers from some mental, emotional, or moral problem has been covered thoroughly in the last several weeks. Please do not try to repeat it, especially if the purpose of doing so is to prevent a discussion among those who are interested. thanks, john
