> On 09/08/2020 11:49 AM Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > How about: > > 2. Updated Requirements > This document removes and replaces the normative requirements from sections 3.1.1 > and section 3.1.2 of RFC3405 with: > > The registration of a NAPTR record for a URI scheme MUST NOT precede registration of that scheme. IANA will review the request against for > > 1. correctness and technical soundness (eg. valid databases, service parameters etc.) and > 2. consistency with the published URI resolution application specification, and > 3. to ensure that the NAPTR record for a DNS-based URI does not delegate resolution of the URI to a party other than the holder of the DNS name. This last rule is to insure that a given URI's resolution hint doesn't hijack (inadvertently or otherwise) network traffic for a given domain. > > 3. IANA Considerations > > This update does not change the IANA submission procedure in Section 5 of RFC 3405. > -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
