Vijay, thanks for your review. I entered a No Objection ballot. Alissa > On Sep 18, 2020, at 10:35 AM, Vijay Gurbani via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Reviewer: Vijay Gurbani > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-cose-x509-07 > Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani > Review Date: 2020-09-18 > IETF LC End Date: 2020-10-01 > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > Summary: Ready for publication with nits. > > Major issues: 0 > > Minor issues: 0 > > Nits/editorial comments: 5 > > (Sn refers to Section n) > - S1: s/ad decided/and decided/ > - S1: s/Since that time a/Since that time, a/ > - S1: s/in the 6TiSCH environment [I-D.richardson-enrollment-roadmap], > describes/in the 6TiSCH environment, [I-D.richardson-enrollment-roadmap] > describes/ - S1: "A third scenario..." The wording seemed odd since there is no > text that sets the expectation that there will be three scenarios for > discussion. If your intent is to enumerate the different scenarios, probably > best to prepare the reader for this ahead of time. - S2: s/which it can then > provide to/that it subsequently provides to/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
