On 20/10/20 23:48, Ted Lemon wrote:
On Oct 20, 2020, at 7:24 PM, Fernando Gont <fgont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:fgont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
The aforementioned values for AdvPreferredLifetime and
AdvValidLifetime are expected to be appropriate for most general
network scenarios. However, operators should analyze what specific
values for these configuration variables would better suit their
specific network scenarios.
That seems pretty vague. It would be better to say something like:
The aforementioned values for AdvPreferredLifetime and AdvValidLifetime
are expected to be an appropriate default for most networks. In some
networks, particularly where the operator has complete control of prefix
allocation and where hosts on the network may spend long periods
sleeping (e.g., sensors with limited battery), longer default values may
be appropriate.
Thanks a lot for the suggested text!
Unless folks argue otherwise, I will incorporate it into the next rev.
Thanks again!
Regards,
--
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fgont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492
--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
