RE: Enough is Enough.

[Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

EXACTLY.

 

From: Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2020 8:07 PM
To: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@xxxxxxxxx>; Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: ietf@xxxxxxxx; legal@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Enough is Enough.

 

I don't see how that applies.  The top of his draft says "This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79."

 

And I don't see any stream listed for his drafts so I think just the RFC editor copyright rules apply.  I think these drafts should be deleted.

 

 

 

 

On 10/20/2020 1:48 PM Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

 

 

Khaled,

 

You should give the file names if you submit a request related to

drafts particularly as it seems that these drafts, except

draft-omar-ipv10-12, do not follow the convention of including your

name as the second token.

 

Assuming the other drafts have the same copyright and license notice

as draft-omar-ipv10-12, you have granted copyright in these drafts

jointly to the IETF Trust and yourself. The IETF Trust licenses IETF

participants as in

https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info/IETF-TLP-5.pdf particularly

Section 3.

 

In my opinion, these drafts should not and will not be deleted. They

will time out six months after posting and be removed from the active

directory.

 

Thanks,

Donald

===============================

Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell)

2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA

d3e3e3@xxxxxxxxx

 

On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 1:15 PM Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>

Hi Jay,

>

>

Could you please do the following request?

>

>

Deleting these IDs completely from the IETF repository:

>

>

1) Internet Protocol version 10 (IPv10).

2) IPmix.

3) KHALED Routing Protocol (KRP).

4) Regional Routing Protocol (RRP).

5) Numbering Exchange Protocol (NEP).

6) Satellite Internet (SI).

7) ASN Label Switching Protocol (ALSP).

>

>

Thanks in advance.

>

>

Khaled Omar

>

>

From: Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2020 7:10 PM

To: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@xxxxxxxxxxx>; ietf@xxxxxxxx

Cc: ietf-draft-submission@xxxxxxxx

Subject: Re: Enough is Enough.

>

>

I would ask an IESG member. And I think Jay Daley offered up legal@xxxxxxxx on a different thread.

>

>

>

>

On 10/20/2020 1:00 PM Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>

>

>

>

Dear IETFers,

>

>

I hope this is my last e-mail with the IETF and I’m not feeling coward to repeat my first request regarding deleting my drafts from the IETF repository.

>

>

Can anyone tell me whom is the responsible person for deleting drafts from the IETF?

>

>

P.S. I don’t want to find any BCP or whatever that mention that the original author of the draft has not the right to ask for deleting his drafts as this doesn’t make any sense.

>

>

I wish you good luck after the deletion and the ideas not being used by the IETF as they have no benefits as many claims.

>

>

Sorry for any disturbance.

>

>

Regards,

>

>

Khaled Omar

>

>

>