Barbara, Thanks, very helpful. Bob > On Oct 16, 2020, at 5:53 AM, STARK, BARBARA H <bs7652@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Bob, > >> Barbara, >> >> I see that at the end of the feedback form there are three topics: >> >> IESG Expectations of Proposed Standard >> IESG and IAB as servants of the community >> Engaging with external, impacted stakeholders >> >> Could you provide more background on what the NomCom is looking for? >> The current descriptions are a bit sparse. > > Thanks for asking. > Apparently I forgot to include the ietf list on my previous Announcement. <sigh> > No wonder (hopefully that's the reason) I got so little feedback. > https://datatracker.ietf.org/nomcom/ann/202641/ > > Summary: Several people have provided comments to NomCom on topics they'd > like us to keep in mind as we go through our process. But we need to get more community > input on these topics to get a better sense of what the overall community thinks. We > also need to know if there are other topics to consider. > > I've copied the text of that Announcement below, so you don't have to follow the link. > It provides more about the source of the first two topics. The 3rd topic (engaging with > external stakeholders) was about how the IESG should relate with non-technical forums > and stakeholders that are affected by the non-technical consequences of new IETF > standards, like governments and regulators. I'll ask the originator of that topic to > either send more on that to the ietf list to generate discussion or for > permission to include the text provided to NomCom. > Thx, > Barbara > > =========== Announcement sent last week ======= > > Hi IETFers, > NomCom has entered a "quiet" week where nominations are now closed > and feedback on nominees hasn't started (the nominees have through > October 13 to accept nominations and provide questionnaire responses; > NomCom opens up for nominee feedback on Oct 14). > > But "quiet" is boring. So I'd like to use this opportunity to encourage input on "Topics". > > We've received input and feedback on some broader IETF issues from > some people. To get a better sense of where the community stands > on these Topics (and to know if there are other Topics we should think > about when interviewing nominees and selecting candidates), we need > more community input. These Topics are intended to help provide > NomCom with guidance and prioritization on what values and > competencies the community would like to see represented in both the > individual and the holistic composition of its leadership. > > Topics received so far are listed on > https://datatracker.ietf.org/nomcom/2020/feedback/ > > They are: > - IESG expectations of Proposed Standard > - IESG and IAB as servants of the community > > In case you're wondering, these were taken from Brian Carpenter's open > letter to NomCom (https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-carpenter-nomcom2020-letter-00.html). > We also received some similar input (not from Brian) during IETF 108 > NomCom office hours. > > There are many good ways for you to provide input to NomCom on > broader (not nominee-specific) topics: > 1. Discussion on the ietf email list (for those who feel comfortable doing so) > 2. Go to https://datatracker.ietf.org/nomcom/2020/feedback/ , click on > one of the Topics listed at the right, and enter your thoughts (an excellent > mechanism for those not fully comfortable with the ietf list) > 3. An email to nomcom20@xxxxxxxx (also an excellent mechanism for > those not comfortable with the ietf list, and can be used to suggest new > topics as well as comment on existing topics) > 4. Attend our Office Hours (dates and times in November to be announced) > > NomCom is expected to represent the IETF community. We need your > thoughtful input and feedback to do this well. > > Next week I'll send an announcement calling for nominee feedback.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
