On 15/10/2020 00:40, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: >> Every piece of digital evidence that is collected should be time stamped at >> the time it is collected and enrolled in a notary service using a one way >> sequence. At regular intervals, the notary offering this service should >> cross notarize with other notary services, thus making it impossible for >> any one notary to defect without detection unless every other notary >> colludes. And NIST and every other national lab should run a national cross >> notary service whose probity would be automatically considered valid by the >> courts of that country. >> >> That is not the sort of construct I see being built in blockchain land. >> Noooo, much more fun selling virtual cowrie shells. But it is exactly the >> sort of infrastructure we need. > Yup, that would be swell. Too bad I don't have a budget to help make it > happen. An expired draft with some (fairly vague;-) ideas in that space. [1] There are probably others too. Ours never went anywhere (so far:-) S. [1] https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-farrell-pkng-swig-00.txt
Attachment:
0x5AB2FAF17B172BEA.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
