Because of the low volume of list traffic, Dave and I decided to not submit a session request for IETF 109.
We can always request a virtual interim if needed.
spt
_______________________________________________
Wpack mailing list
Wpack@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wpack
I'm disappointed that WPACK isn't meeting at IETF 109. My impression was that there was quite a bit of activity in the Git repo issue list. I was hoping to be able to ask about two use cases for "packaging" web content. (The use cases aren't important for this note but I'll say they are "save this as mht" multipart/related and (2) the archival case of PDF/A, why people want to save something and have more confidence that people 30 years from now will be able to read the documents. That might address the dilemma of spec-iing what the RFC SVG capabilities are uncertain.
now perhaps you'll say these concerns are "out of scope" but perhaps there are other groups also deciding "attending" an IETF meeting is optional.
