Hi Tom, I have changed the order of the code to align this huge piece of code across multiple technology-specific topology models. Since this piece of code is quite huge and error-prone, it would be good for the editors to be able to copy&paste from multiple technology-specific topology models. I understand you concerns with reviewing the YANG code in the -26 revision. In order to address it, I have prepared a version of the YANG module with the former order and created a diff with the YANG module in -25 (see in attachment). The plan is not to change this order any more in the next revisions so you can keep reviewing the I-D diffs from the -27 revision onward. Regarding the issue with the YANG tree, let me check with co-authors. We can fix any issue with the YANG tree in the next revision. Thanks, Italo > -----Original Message----- > From: tom petch [mailto:daedulus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: mercoledì 23 settembre 2020 12:06 > To: last-call@xxxxxxxx > Cc: ccamp@xxxxxxxx; ccamp-chairs@xxxxxxxx; Daniele Ceccarelli > <daniele.ceccarelli@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-yang@xxxxxxxx; > db3546@xxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [CCAMP] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-yang-25.txt> > (A YANG Data Model for WSON (Wavelength Switched Optical Networks)) to > Proposed Standard > > A new verson of this I-D has been posted with substantial changes. In > particular, the sequence of definitions in the YANG module has been changed > while the YANG tree diagram has not been updated to match. Look for > example at augments 4, 5, 6 and 7. In the tree diagram, as in -25, they are to > label-start, label-end, label-step, label-hop; in the module they are to 'from', > 'to' and then switch from node attributes to information source. > > It is technically possible for me to review -26 against -25 but it would take so > long that I am not going to do it. My review is to compare, side by side, old > and new, so resequencing destroys that and with a 62 page I-D I will not > contemplate any other approach. > > A new tree diagram, to match the YANG module, again would not make it > feasible. The module sequence needs to be the same as in -25 for me. > > Tom Petch > > On 17/09/2020 11:25, tom petch wrote: > > On 16/09/2020 21:45, The IESG wrote: > >> > >> The IESG has received a request from the Common Control and > >> Measurement Plane WG (ccamp) to consider the following document: - 'A > >> YANG Data Model for WSON (Wavelength Switched Optical Networks)' > >> <draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-yang-25.txt> as Proposed Standard > >> > >> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits > >> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to > >> the last-call@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2020-09-30. Exceptionally, > >> comments may be sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please > >> retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. > > > > Two glitches and some trivia: > > > > Introduction > > /impairement/impairment/ > > > > The only key word I see is a 'should' in IANA which is going to go so > > whether or not Requirements Language should be included is a moot point. > > > > YANG import for layer0-types references the wrong I-D > > > > YANG module description talks of two encoding documents but omits > > RFC7581 > > > > grouping wson-node-attributes has the same 'e.g.' for both true and > > false which looks odd; and I wonder if 'i.e.' is intended > > > > the e-mail address for Aihua Guo is different for the YANG module and > > for Authors' Addresses > > > > Tom Petch > > > >> Abstract > >> > >> > >> This document provides a YANG data model for the routing and > >> wavelength assignment (RWA) TE topology in wavelength switched > >> optical networks (WSONs). The YANG data model defined in this > >> document conforms to the Network Management Datastore Architecture > >> (NMDA). > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> The file can be obtained via > >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-yang/ > >> > >> > >> > >> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. > >> > >> > >> The document contains these normative downward references. > >> See RFC 3967 for additional information: > >> draft-ietf-ccamp-optical-impairment-topology-yang: A Yang Data > >> Model for Optical Impairment-aware Topology (None - IETF stream) > >> draft-ietf-ccamp-flexigrid-yang: YANG data model for Flexi-Grid > >> Optical Networks (None - IETF stream) > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> IETF-Announce mailing list > >> IETF-Announce@xxxxxxxx > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce > >> . > >> > > >
<<< text/html; name="Diff_ ietf-wson-topology.yang - ietf-wson-topology-new.yang.html": Unrecognized >>>
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
