Re: A Call of a WG for IPv10.

[Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I don’t know why people are afraid, what is the problem if i cannot work with the code and need some help, people will gain more experience and fun when developing something new or maybe they used to do it before do it will be easy for all to accomplish that group of people and make some progress.

To be clear, i don’t see any progress with any of my drafts, and i don’t know the Real reason, only one draft discussed in a meeting and the idea was taken without a notice.

I hope what i’m doing with the ietf is not a waste of my time and efforts.

Thanks,

Khaled Omar

Get Outlook for iOS

---

From: ietf <ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx> on behalf of Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, September 26, 2020 12:10:18 AM
To: Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <evyncke@xxxxxxxxx>; ietf@xxxxxxxx <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: A Call of a WG for IPv10.

 

Yes exactly, thanks Eric.

 

Khaled Omar

 

From: Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <evyncke@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, September 26, 2020 12:08 AM
To: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@xxxxxxxxxxx>; ietf@xxxxxxxx
Cc: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: A Call of a WG for IPv10.

 

Dear all,

 

Let me correct slightly the content of this email:

1)     Even if Fred Baker (OPSEC WG chair) and myself (INT AD) are in Cc: we do not endorse  in any way this initiative

2)     There is no IPv10[1] WG planned for now, so, it is more about a ‘potential WG’ than a ‘future WG’

 

Of course, as described in RFC 2418, any member of the community can try to build a team around his/her ideas/requirements/topics and follow the creation procedure described in RFC 2418.

 

So, I assume this is what Khaled intends to initiate with his email, so, communicate directly with him if you support the initiative and are ready to work with him.

 

Let’s not discuss the technical merits and issues of the “IPv10” draft on this mailing list but rather please communicate directly with Khaled Omar directly.

 

Regards

 

-éric

 

[1] obviously, IANA has not yet allocated 10 as a version of IP.

 

From: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Friday, 25 September 2020 at 21:23
To: "ietf@xxxxxxxx" <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@xxxxxxxxx>, Eric Vyncke <evyncke@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: A Call of a WG for IPv10.

 

Dear ALL,

 

This is to inform you that we are looking for participants to join a future WG for IPv10 please add your name if you are interested so we can count the number of participants and start the work.

 

E.g Khaled Omar (Yes).

 

Thanks in advance,

 

Khaled Omar