I see a possible process problem with this I-D. It provides common
YANG definitions for WSON and for flexi-grid and the WSON I-D is in
IETF Last Call alongside it so no problem there. layer0-types has
definitions for flexi-grid but they are not used anywhere that I can
see. draft-ietf-ccamp-flexigid-yang is not in line with the current
layer0-types (and looks like it has yet to catch up with
ietf-te-topology). There is also an expired
flexigrid-media-channel-yang whose imports are quite unlike the current
layer0-types. So it seems to me that it will be a while before
flexi-grid gets to the point where it will be apparent whether or not
what is in layer0-types is suitable, by which time, layer0-types will be
an RFC or well on its way there, and may then need revising to suit
flexi-grid.
Tricky.
Tom Petch
----- Original Message -----
From: "The IESG" <iesg-secretary@xxxxxxxx>
To: "IETF-Announce" <ietf-announce@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: <ccamp@xxxxxxxx>; <ccamp-chairs@xxxxxxxx>; "Daniele Ceccarelli"
<daniele.ceccarelli@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; <db3546@xxxxxxx>;
<draft-ietf-ccamp-layer0-types@xxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2020 9:44 PM
Subject: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ccamp-layer0-types-06.txt> (A YANG Data
Model for Layer 0 Types) to Proposed Standard
The IESG has received a request from the Common Control and
Measurement Plane
WG (ccamp) to consider the following document: - 'A YANG Data Model
for Layer
0 Types'
<draft-ietf-ccamp-layer0-types-06.txt> as Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final
comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
last-call@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2020-09-30. Exceptionally,
comments may
be sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the
beginning
of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
