Re: [Last-Call] [v6ops] Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-nd-cache-init-05

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Section 1.0 says:
  } a new privacy address [RFC4941] or if the router's Neighbor Cache has
  } been flushed.

Are there operational reasons why a router's neighbor cache would be flushed?
Are you just thinking about a normal LRU type expiry from the cache?

The way I read this is because some operator explicited flushed the cache,
and I don't know why that would be done regularly.

-- 
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [ 
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        | network architect  [ 
]     mcr@xxxxxxxxxxxx  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [ 
	

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux