Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4941bis-10.txt> (Temporary Address Extensions for Stateless Address Autoconfiguration in IPv6) to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/9/20 00:36, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Just a detail:

(if this was code, you'd do a #define in a single place, and just use
that constant)

Technically, I think it needs to be defined separately for each interface.

Yep. What I was trying to mean is that you don't plage the source code with a hard-coded value that is a parameter. That's bad practice.


So defined in the driver source code, most likely. I have no idea whether
real implementations do that.

Apart from that: I agree with Jinmei-san's approach.

wfm, too. Lorenzo?

Thanks,
--
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fgont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492




--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux