| Francesca, thanks for your review. Mohit, thanks for your response. I entered a No Objection ballot.
Alissa
Hi Francesca, Thanks for the comments, I will make these changes.
Regards, Mohit On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 2:54 AM Francesca Palombini via Datatracker < noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote: Reviewer: Francesca Palombini
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more information, please see the FAQ at
<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-ietf-lamps-ocsp-nonce-03
Reviewer: Francesca Palombini
Review Date: 2020-09-02
IETF LC End Date: 2020-09-02
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
Summary: This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits that
should be fixed before publication.
Major issues: -
Minor issues: -
Nits/editorial comments:
Section 1:
OLD:
This extension was
previously defined in section 4.1.1 of [RFC6960]
NEW:
This extension was
previously defined in section 4.4.1 of [RFC6960]
Section 2:
The message format for the OCSP request and response is defined in
the [RFC6960]. It also defines the standard extensions for OCSP
messages based on the extension model employed in X.509 version 3
certificates (see [RFC5280]).
"It" in the second sentence is ambiguous, I think it would be better to replace
with "[RFC6960]".
_______________________________________________
Spasm mailing list
Spasm@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@xxxxxxxxhttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
|
--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
