Re: IPv10 I-D Destiny.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 2:48 PM Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Maybe there is confusion at the ietf, KRP is different than IPv10 I-D.

It seems clear there is no interest from IETF participants in pursuing this work. Consider:

* More than 20 years have passed since IPv6 was published as a proposed standard.
* IPv6 is in widespread use: for example, roughly 30% of Google's traffic comes from IPv6 clients.
* There are already numerous v4/v6 transition and interoperability technologies, and seemingly little appetite for developing any more.

Bringing potential work to the IETF carries the burden of convincing others to work with you on it. You have not done this, and frankly you are unlikely to do so as the internet engineering community has decided en masse that the v4/v6 interoperability problem space has been sufficiently covered by existing technologies and has moved on to other things.

Kyle


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux