RE: IPv10 I-D Destiny.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Alllll,

 

Maybe there is confusion at the ietf, KRP is different than IPv10 I-D.

 

Khaled Omar

 

From: Robert Raszuk <robert@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2020 8:09 PM
To: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: IPv10 I-D Destiny.

 

 

This topic has been discussed in RTGWG already. You got the feedback. 

 

 

How much more time we need to spend on something which is not deployable in practice ? 

 

Thx,
R. 

 

On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 6:27 AM Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

It’s really weird to hear the silence for my e-mails at the IETf main list, at the same time, to see insistence with consensus not take any decision or any official announcement to the internet community regarding the division problem, people are in need to get feedback for this issue as this problem affects all internet users, I can’t keep making the problem clear more than that as it is obvious for all, time to act positively to get benefits for all.

 

I write here because I care about solving the problem and can’t do more than proposing a solution, please let’s put any hat or agenda aside and make an announcement regarding how the IETF is working on solving that problem and I’m sure they have full support from the community as they believe on you, otherwise, it will be a waste of time not to make any discussion regarding this issue to make people feel comfortable.

 

Khaled Omar

 

From: ietf <ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Khaled Omar
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2020 3:48 AM
To: IETF Discussion <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: IPv10 I-D Destiny.

 

Hi All,

 

As all of you now see the great contributions to developing the Internet it is not from the logic point of view to keep watching the division occurs between internet hosts.

 

As I proposed an I-D earlier that offers a solution to this pandemic that started to be distributed in the internet due to IPv4 address space exhaustion and the no migration to IPv6 occurred till now.

 

So please take one moment and evaluate the IPv10 I-D and make an accurate decision whether it can be promoted to a Standard or there is another solution that could solve this problem from its roots.

 

Here is the linky to the IPv10 I-D:

 

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-omar-ipv10-06

 

THANK YOU,

 

Khaled Omar


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux