On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 3:17 PM Paul Wouters <paul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > How is this different from a non-profit IX ? > it sounds like the proposal is effectively (to use your example) a "global non-profit IX". It sounds like the expectation is likely that: 1) 'the core' operates globally as a neutral provider 2) 'the core' offers 'transit' to end-networks (LMPs) at a cost which is not ... usery 3) all of the global areas have the same world view on 'Network Neutrality' It seems ... like a pretty high lift to move from today to the utopia proposed. > How could you prevent ISPs from purposefully ignoring the poc? > > Paul > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Aug 11, 2020, at 14:50, Lars Eggert <lars@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Scott Shenker et al. just presented a pretty thought-provoking "public option" for the Internet's core backbone at SIGCOMM: https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3387514.3405875 > > > > If you scroll down (or go to https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3387514..3405875#sec-supp), his recorded talk video gives a high-level overview. > > > > (PDF and video *should* be open access and work for me, but you never know with the ACM...) > > > > Lars >
