Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>    and 20 years from now we're sitting on exactly the same mail thread and argue
    about replacing min and sec.

That's fine.  Language evolves.  As do standards.  Nobody will ever need more than 640Kb.  Nobody will ever need more than 32bits of IP address.  Why should a document be different?





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux