I agree that this is a worthwhile effort. And: On 2020-7-24, at 5:01, Joseph Touch <touch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I agree that none of this doc should mandate when to use any particular alternate, but it should say that documents SHOULD NOT use the exclusionary language except in direct reference to legacy uses. Leave it to the community and RSE to help clean things up - and yes, tools help here too. +1 Lars
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
